“The pre-course joining instructions arrived about a week earlier. I had a quick scan through to be aware of what was coming my way. Although I have been responsible for asset management for a long time, it didn’t make me feel like it would be a waste of time. I was going to get someone else’s viewpoint on how something could be delivered or incorporated in the workplace.
“It’s quite an intense course and, when you are remote, it can be difficult to remain engaged. But that wasn’t the case, here, and I think that was to the credit of the trainer, Matthew Laskaj. We had plenty of breaks, the pace was good and Matthew had a nice, engaging style. He allowed for what he called ‘Pause for Thought’ moments – a couple of minutes at the end of a topic to take yourself away, think about what you’d just covered, how you would apply that in your work and make a few notes. I found that a really useful exercise.
“There were four of us on the course; all asset managers to an extent, responsible for engineering maintenance or reliability. At the start, the trainer asked us each if there was anything in particular we wanted to get out of the course. He then returned to those areas and focused on them specifically at different points. Matthew made an effort to understand each person’s needs and not just deliver a generic asset management session. That worked very well.
“There was a lot of discussion and interaction, and we had the opportunity to discuss things amongst us as a group. Matthew gave us lots of real-world examples, as well as from his career, plus encouraged us to share our experience, too. The latter was fascinating as you would get ideas or solutions you hadn’t considered. The two days were very engaging and interesting.”